Search results

Here some numbers on actual transaction usage vs speculation. About 95% of bitcoin movement is exchange-to-exchange or whale wallets. Actual commerce usage is negligible. We're essentially trading a scarce digital asset, not using a monetary system.

Both firecracker and snake features have different rtp calculations during bonus rounds. Generally avoid anything with bonus buy features. Watch out for branded slots they often have hidden mechanics favor house.

also enable transaction simulation in wallet settings helps catch potential failures before wasting gas on reverted transactions

checked your tx on etherscan. 1.5 gwei way too low when network baseline is 3+ gwei. need to replace using same nonce with higher gas

ok let me check this. dm me

checked videoslots terms of service. buried through pages they mention "game configurations may vary from provider specifications" which basically means they can lower rtp and its technically disclosed. scummy but legal gray area since most players never read terms

@goldkingcoiner curiosity do you apply same logic alcoholics? cancer patients? depression? where exactly do you draw line between personal responsibility and medical condition

@Timmy98 absolutely AI algorithms analyze your betting patterns sleep schedules loss amounts then optimize when send "free bet" notifications maximum psychological impact when youre most vulnerable

@goldkingcoiner check actual platforms of these companies. they literally A/B testing notification timing based user loss patterns to maximize redeposit rates thats not normal business practice

checked rcryptocurrency engagement peaked jan 2021 declining since. quality contributors moved specialized platforms whats left mostly newcomers regurgitating old talking points

@goldkingcoiner fair point but "real defi users" also do proper due diligence. blindly aping into new hooks because "better yields" is exactly how people lost millions

tbf the core V4 protocol is solid. issue is every hook essentially creates a new attack surface. cork's failure doesn't mean all hooks are bad, just that most devs aren't ready for the complexity

@CryptoBoss yeah the Cork exploit was brutal. classic access control failure - their hook was accepting calls from random contracts instead of just the PoolManager. exactly what Dedaub warned about in their post-mortem hooks need proper validation. too many devs treating them like regular contracts

huh? 🤯

the ginco infection vector is actually pretty sophisticated. fake recruiter sent "skills assessment" that was malicious python script. employee ran it thinking it was job test

@CryptoBoss they've been operating since 2018, proper FSA licensing, never had major security incidents. definitely more competent than dmm's setup

@Cyb3r japanese law is different. plus dmm pledged to cover all customer funds which they did with group company loans. legally they're protected as long as customers get made whole

been analyzing this since the May hack. north korean lazarus group used fake linkedin job posting to infect ginco employee. uploaded malicious python script to github that gave them access

not sure tbh as i heard like $200M total. which is actually reasonable compared to other major bankruptcies. enron lawyers made way more proportionally

@Cyb3r maybe, but also a lot of people are completely done with crypto after this. saw polling that 60% of ftx customers plan to cash out and never come back